Determinan Kualitas Audit: Opini Auditor dan Audit Delay

Authors

  • Fakhriyah Nailah Andita Universitas Bumigora Author
  • Rabiatul Aldawiya Universitas Bumigora Author
  • Natasya Joevanny Tammu Universitas Bumigora Author
  • Agustina Mendiska Jamat Universitas Bumigora Author
  • Sir'aini Aini Universitas Bumigora Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69657/asqx3g87

Keywords:

Audit Quality, Auditor Opinion, Audit Delay, Binary Logistic Regression

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of auditor opinion and audit delay on audit quality. The study uses a quantitative approach with a binary logistic regression analysis method using the Eviews9 application. The research data were obtained from 45 observations with independent variables being auditor and audit delay, while the dependent variable is audit quality. The results show that auditor opinion has a positive and significant effect on audit quality with a probability value of 0.0173 (<0.05). Meanwhile, audit delay has a negative and significant effect on audit quality with a probability value of 0.0295 (<0.05). Simultaneously, audit opinion and audit delay have a significant effect on audit quality as evidenced by a probability value (LR Statistic) of 0.000047. The findings of this study indicate that audit quality is influenced by the timeliness of audit completion and the quality of the opinion given by the auditor.

References

Agoes, S. (2019). Auditing: Petunjuk praktis pemeriksaan akuntan oleh akuntan publik (Buku 1, Ed. 5). Salemba Empat.

Akita, T., & Alisjahbana, A. S. (2002). Regional income inequality in Indonesia and the initial impact of the economic crisis. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 38(2), 201–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/000749102320145057

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beasley, M. S. (2015). Auditing dan jasa assurance: Pendekatan terintegrasi (Jilid 1, Ed. 15). Erlangga.

Ariyanto, D., Andayani, G. W., & Putri, I. G. A. P. (2020). Influence of justice, culture and love of money towards ethical perception on tax evasion with gender as moderating variable. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 23(1), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-06-2019-0047

DeAngelo, L. E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(81)90002-1

Dewan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2020). Standar akuntansi keuangan. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.

Ghozali, I. (2018). Aplikasi analisis multivariate dengan program IBM SPSS 25 (Ed. 9). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics (Ed. 5). McGraw-Hill Irwin.

Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia. (2021). Standar audit (SA) 700 (Revisi 2021): Perumusan suatu opini dan pelaporan atas laporan keuangan. Institut Akuntan Publik Indonesia.

Mulyadi. (2016). Auditing (Buku 1, Ed. 7). Salemba Empat.

Additional Files

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Andita, F. N., Aldawiya, R. ., Tammu, N. J., Jamat, A. M., & Aini, S. (2026). Determinan Kualitas Audit: Opini Auditor dan Audit Delay. Zentrum Economic, Business, Management, Accounting Research, 4(2), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.69657/asqx3g87