Risiko Gangguan Listrik Dan Keberlangsungan Operasional Bisnis: Studi Kasus Makassar Dan Gowa

Authors

  • Muhammad Novrizal Ramadhan Universitas Negeri Makassar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69657/vn8azh32

Keywords:

electricity disruptions, business operational continuity, risk management, MSMEs, ISO 31000:2018

Abstract

Electricity supply disruptions may undermine business operational continuity, particularly in enterprises that heavily depend on electrical energy for production, storage, and customer services. This study aims to examine the risks of electricity disruptions to business operational continuity in Makassar City and Gowa Regency and to identify mitigation measures from a risk management perspective. This research employs a descriptive qualitative approach with a case study design, using secondary data drawn from media reports, official statements issued by the electricity provider, local government information, and relevant oversight institution documents. The analysis is guided by the ISO 31000:2018 framework, particularly the stages of risk identification, analysis, evaluation, and treatment. The findings indicate that electricity supply disruptions create risks to production and service continuity, equipment and inventory security, and business revenue opportunities. These risks may be more significant for micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs), which often have limited resources to establish operational alternatives. Responses from the electricity provider, local governments, the regional legislative council, and the Ombudsman demonstrate institutional attention to electricity supply reliability. Nevertheless, information transparency and coordination in disruption management remain important areas for improvement. This study highlights the need for risk management practices to support business operational continuity through emergency operating procedures, inventory protection, and alternative business operation planning.

References

Abdisa, L. T. (2018). Power outages, economic cost, and firm performance: Evidence from Ethiopia. Utilities Policy, 53, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2018.06.009

Abeberese, A. B., Ackah, C. G., & Asuming, P. O. (2021). Productivity losses and firm responses to electricity shortages: Evidence from Ghana. The World Bank Economic Review, 35(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhz027

Aly, H., & Ahmed, F. (2025). Effects of electricity outages on enterprise productivity in Egypt: Lessons learned. PLOS ONE, 20(9), Article e0329479. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0329479

Apeti, A. E., & Ly, A. (2024). Power constraints and firm-level total factor productivity in developing countries. Energy, 304, Article 132871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.132871

Ciocoiu, C. N., et al. (2025). Exploring the link between risk management and performance of MSMEs: A bibliometric review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 39(4), 1523–1552. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12664

De Matteis, J. (2023). Business continuity management and organizational resilience: A small and medium enterprises (SMEs) perspective. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 31(4), 670–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12470

Falentina, A. T., & Resosudarmo, B. P. (2019). The impact of blackouts on the performance of micro and small enterprises: Evidence from Indonesia. World Development, 124, Article 104635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104635

Ferreira de Araújo Lima, P., Crema, M., & Verbano, C. (2020). Risk management in SMEs: A systematic literature review and future directions. European Management Journal, 38(1), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.005

Fried, S., & Lagakos, D. (2023). Electricity and firm productivity: A general-equilibrium approach. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 15(4), 67–103. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20210248

Hamid, M. I., Sulfandri, & Afifah. (2023). The effect of electricity supply interruptions on small business productivity in West Sumatra. Jurnal Nasional Teknik Elektro, 12(3), 37–49. https://doi.org/10.25077/jnte.v12n3.1092.2023

International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 risk management—Guidelines. ISO.

Koks, E., Pant, R., Thacker, S., & Hall, J. W. (2019). Understanding business disruption and economic losses due to electricity failures and flooding. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 10, 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-019-00236-y

Kouakou, D. C. M. (2026). Do power outages hurt registered firms’ access to finance in developing countries? Oxford Economic Papers, 78(3), 770–798. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpag024

Naude, M. J., & Chiweshe, N. (2017). A proposed operational risk management framework for small and medium enterprises. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 20(1), Article a1621. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajems.v20i1.1621

Tapang, F. N. (2023). Investigating the impact of electricity supply interruptions on the expansion of small and medium size enterprises (SMEs): A systematic literature review. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 11(1), 84–101. https://doi.org/10.37335/ijek.v11i1.191

Awang Ali, Q. S., Hanafiah, M. H., & Mogindol, S. H. (2023). Systematic literature review of business continuity management (BCM) practices: Integrating organisational resilience and performance in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) BCM framework. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 99, Article 104135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2023.104135

De Matteis, J., Elia, G., & Del Vecchio, P. (2023). Business continuity management and organizational resilience: A small and medium enterprises (SMEs) perspective. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 31(4), 670–682. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12470

Falentina, A. T., & Resosudarmo, B. P. (2019). The impact of blackouts on the performance of micro and small enterprises: Evidence from Indonesia. World Development, 124, Article 104635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104635

Febriansyah, A. A. (2026, September 1). PLN ungkap alasan pemadaman listrik bergilir di Sulsel. RRI. https://rri.co.id/makassar/regional/2698790/pln-ungkap-alasan-pemadaman-listrik-bergilir-di-sulsel

Fatir, M. D. (2026, September 11). PLN-DPRD Sulsel sepakati empat poin selesaikan pemadaman bergilir. ANTARA News. https://makassar.antaranews.com/amp/berita/637852/pln-dprd-sulsel-sepakati-empat-poin-selesaikan-pemadaman-listrik-bergilir

International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 Risk management—Guidelines. https://committee.iso.org/standard/65694.html

Ombudsman RI Perwakilan Sulawesi Selatan. (2026a, September 2). Ombudsman Sulsel dan PLN bahas pemadaman bergilir serta pemerataan akses listrik. https://ombudsman.go.id/perwakilan/news/r/pwk--ombudsman-sulsel-dan-pln-bahas-pemadaman-bergilir-serta-pemerataan-akses-listrik

Ombudsman RI Perwakilan Sulawesi Selatan. (2026b, Oktober 25). Respons keresahan publik, Ombudsman usut pemadaman listrik oleh PLN. https://ombudsman.go.id/perwakilan/news/r/pwkmedia--respons-keresahan-publik-ombudsman-usut-pemadaman-listrik-oleh-pln

Pemerintah Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. (2026, September 10). Pemadaman listrik bergilir di sejumlah wilayah, Gubernur Sulsel: Diupayakan kembali normal, mohon masyarakat bersabar. https://sulselprov.go.id/berita/pemadaman-listrik-bergilir-di-sejumlah-wilayah-gubernur-sulsel-diupayakan-kembali-normal-mohon-masyarakat-bersabar

Wardyah, N. S. (2026a, Agustus 31). PLN UID Sulselbar lakukan pemadaman listrik bergilir. ANTARA News. https://makassar.antaranews.com/berita/637113/pln-uid-sulselbar-lakukan-pemadaman-listrik-bergilir

Wardyah, N. S. (2026b, September 1). Respons keluhan warga, Pemkot Makassar dan PLN UID Sulselrabar bahas pemadaman listrik bergilir. ANTARA News. https://makassar.antaranews.com/amp/berita/637187/resfons-keluhan-warga-pemkot-makassar-dan-pln-uid-sulselrabar-bahas-pemadaman-listrik-bergilir

Downloads

Published

2026-11-09

How to Cite

Ramadhan, M. N. (2026). Risiko Gangguan Listrik Dan Keberlangsungan Operasional Bisnis: Studi Kasus Makassar Dan Gowa. Zentrum Economic, Business, Management, Accounting Research, 4(4), 210-224. https://doi.org/10.69657/vn8azh32